The Just-World Hypothesis is a cognitive bias or belief that the world is inherently fair—i.e., “good things happen to good people and bad things happen to bad people.” While it can provide a sense of control, it may also lead to victim-blaming when misfortune occurs.
Key Points:
- Psychological Function: Offers a sense of security and predictability in life events.
- Consequences: People may downplay systemic factors or random chance and instead blame individuals for their suffering (e.g., “They must have done something to deserve it.”).
- Relevance in Therapy: Challenging the just-world bias can be crucial when addressing guilt, shame, or distorted views about personal responsibility, particularly in trauma survivors.
- Balancing View: Recognizing that luck, social circumstances, and random events significantly impact outcomes helps foster empathy and nuanced understanding of injustice.
